Internet Surfer 2.0/Internet Surfer 2.0 (Wayzata Technology) (1996).iso/pc/text/mac/faqs.212

Text File | 1996-02-12 | 28.4 KB | 625 lines

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS);faqs.212



Detailed directions for making a traditional kimono, outer robe, haori jacket,
hanten jacket, wraparound top, vest, slacks, obi sashes and tabi socks.
Includes comments about using traditional (14" wide) materials and modern
materials.  Includes notes for fitting Westerners who are often larger than
traditional Asian people.  Meticulous details!

Make Your Own Japanese Clothes: Patterns and Ideas for Modern Wear.  John
Marshall.  ISBN 0-87011-865-x. $16.95 (paper). 1988. Kodansha International
Ltd.


FYF: Flatter Your Figure. [alg]

Includes tests (using a mirror, stick, string and helpers) for about 20 figure
features such as short legs, short or long waisted, swayback, shape of
shoulders, bust, waist, hips, and arms.  Also analyzes shape of face and
haircut. Advise for deciding which figure features are advantages, which are
minor disadvantages and which are major disadvantages.  A section showing many
basic garment shapes explains which are favorable or unfavorable for various
figures.  Discusses camaflaging common problems, accenting your best features,
and using garment lines to create illusions.  Emphasizes a positive attitude;
accent positive features and don't draw attention to less desireable features.
Advise for balancing conflicting advise (e.g. styles that are good for some of
your features but bad for other features).

This subject is usually covered in general sewing references, but FYF is a
much more comprehensive guide.  Recommended for people who sew their own
clothing or buy ready made.  Illustrates and discusses women's clothing only.

Flatter Your Figure. Jan Larkey.  $9.95 ISBN 0-13-321795-7. 1991.  Prentice
Hall / Simon Schuster.  Larkey had an article in Threads in ?early 1991? that
contained a number of the ideas in FYF.



FAQ: Where can I get an up to date copy of this FAQ?

When looking for an FAQ list, first do the obvious and check the relevant
newsgroup for articles with "FAQ" in the subject line.  If you don't know how
to check articles marked as read, your sysadmin can tell you. Next, try the
group news.answers since this FAQ is crossposted there.  Again, your sysadmin
can tell you the commands to use in searching.

If you cannot find the FAQ on your system, you can retrieve a copy from
Jonathan Kamen's archive of periodic postings.  For general instructions on
the server, send email containing the commands "help" and "send index" (no
quotes, separate lines) to
    [e-mail]
For a list of all periodic postings that are archives in news.answers, email
the command "send usenet/news.answers/index" to the server.

via anonymous FTP:
Periodic postings including FAQs are archived at "pit-manager.mit.edu"
(18.72.1.58), in the directory "/pub/usenet". The textile FAQs are:
    /pub/usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles
    /pub/usenet/news.answers/crafts-historical-costuming
    /pub/usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles-books/part1
    /pub/usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles-books/part2

via email server:
The address of the server is [e-mail].  To retrieve
files, send email to the server with a blank subject and one or more of these
lines in the body:
    send usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles
    send usenet/news.answers/crafts-historical-costuming
    send usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles-books/part1
    send usenet/news.answers/crafts-textiles-books/part2


=================================
ToDO (maybe):
Is this too big? (books: 1012 lines; h.c 500 lines; sewing 600 lines) should I
    remove references?  say less about books?  oh, I hate editing!
Add home decorating notes
Fix up bibliographic references in Fitting and Pattern Drafting sections
Clean up fitting and pattern drafting sections: re-check some comments, e.g
    on Armstrong and other books
Add fitting section Tbl of Contents
Add sergers to specialty
Add topics from Betzina books
Info on ethnic books (Erikson's Ethnic Costume, etc) for this or hist-cost FAQ
specialty books such as Erikson's fabric manipulations, books on quilted
    clothing? embellishments and special techniques?
Add RLShep's books to hist-cost FAQ for drafting 1800's patterns
Specialty:  Maternity (Great Expectations and that other one that's in print
    now.  name?).  Babies; that Fashion Accessories book;
someone had additional comments on Nancy Zieman; add them in
Martensson, Kerstin: Sewing For Baby, Sewing for Toddlers, incls master
    patterns, publ: Kwik-Sew. softcover, $10? each. Marina recommends;
    where are these available?  (stores that carry Kwik Sew)
Innovative Serging (has chapt on which machines are good) author?
Happy Endings has TONS of bindings for household sewing!
update notes on Holleran and Wolfe books
special: bags ?
    _Lucy's Bag Book_ by Lucy MacKall ISBN 0-395-26473-1.
        Houghton Mifflin Company. 1978.
    _The Total Tote Bag Book: Designer Totes to Craft and Carry_ by
        Joyce Aiken and Jean Ray Laury ISBN 0-8008-7793-4 Taplinger
        Publisheing Co, 1977. (rather 60's or 70's-ish).
specialty: Make Your Own Japanese Clothes by John Marshall
The Sew/Fit Manual (see ad in Sew News Apr '92); can anyone comment on this
    method for fitting?
Miscellaneous: (todo)
    FYF: Flatter Your Figure
    GE: Great Expectations (maternity)
    ARtW: Altering Women's/Men's Ready to Wear
    see also FDPS: Fashion Design for the Plus Size [alg]
copying ready made, how-to: Rusty Benussen's book, Kari Newell Copy Creations,
    SRL,101, ????
Pointer to Threads articles on sleeves and armholes
Pointer to Threads article on using plaids in jackets and lapels
the book by ?Hazen? on sewing machine repair
    Owner's Guide to Sewing Machines, Sergers and Knitting Machines by
    Gale Grigg-Hazen.  Available for $10.40 from Clotilde, 1909 S. W.
    First Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315-2100 (+s/h) 1-800-772-2891
double check the [HIST-COST] labels
=======================================


                    -Anne Louise Gockel
                    Cornell Computer Science

Internet: [e-mail]        UUCP: cornell!alg
Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu news.misc:9015 news.groups:57885 news.admin:25965 news.announce.newgroups:2637 news.answers:3581
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!purdue!spaf
From: [e-mail] (Gene Spafford)
Newsgroups: news.misc,news.groups,news.admin,news.announce.newgroups,news.answers
Subject: Changes to How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Oct 92 05:17:24 GMT
Expires: 18 Dec 92 17:17:23 GMT
Followup-To: news.misc
Organization: Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue Univ.
Lines: 58
Approved: [e-mail]
Supersedes: <[e-mail]>

Archive-name: creating-newsgroups/diff1
Last-change: 23 Sep 1992 by [e-mail] (Gene Spafford)


*** old/howto.n    Sat Sep 19 23:18:22 1992
--- ./src/howto.n    Wed Sep 23 10:56:53 1992
***************
*** 2,5 ****
  Followup-to: news.newusers.questions
! From: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)
! Reply-to: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)

--- 2,5 ----
  Followup-to: news.newusers.questions
! From: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)
! Reply-to: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)

***************
*** 7,9 ****
  Original-author: [e-mail] (Greg Woods)
! Last-change: 30 Nov 91 by [e-mail] (Gene Spafford)

--- 7,9 ----
  Original-author: [e-mail] (Greg Woods)
! Last-change: 23 Sep 1992 by [e-mail] (Gene Spafford)

***************
*** 41,43 ****
     moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups
!    to [e-mail].

--- 41,43 ----
     moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups
!    to [e-mail].

***************
*** 60,62 ****
     charter, or looking for any other guidance in the creation procedure, can
!    send a message to [e-mail]; a few seasoned news administrators
     are available through this address.
--- 60,62 ----
     charter, or looking for any other guidance in the creation procedure, can
!    send a message to [e-mail]; a few seasoned news administrators
     are available through this address.
***************
*** 148,150 ****
     moderated, the vote-taker should send a message during the waiting period to
!    Gene Spafford <[e-mail]> and David C. Lawrence <[e-mail]> with
     both the moderator's contact address and the group's submission address.
--- 148,150 ----
     moderated, the vote-taker should send a message during the waiting period to
!    Gene Spafford <[e-mail]> and David C. Lawrence <[e-mail]> with
     both the moderator's contact address and the group's submission address.
--
Gene Spafford
Software Engineering Research Center & Dept. of Computer Sciences
Purdue University, W. Lafayette IN 47907-1398
Internet:  [e-mail]    phone:  [phone]
Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu news.announce.newusers:928 news.groups:57880 news.admin:25963 news.announce.newgroups:2633 news.answers:3574
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!think.com!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!purdue!uunet.uu.net
From: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers,news.groups,news.admin,news.announce.newgroups,news.answers
Subject: How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 19 Oct 92 05:15:29 GMT
Expires: 18 Dec 92 17:15:25 GMT
Sender: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail] (David C Lawrence)
Followup-To: news.newusers.questions
Lines: 151
Approved: [e-mail]
Supersedes: <[e-mail]>

Archive-name: creating-newsgroups/part1
Original-author: [e-mail] (Greg Woods)
Last-change: 23 Sep 1992 by [e-mail] (Gene Spafford)

                 GUIDELINES FOR USENET GROUP CREATION

REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP CREATION:

   These are guidelines that have been generally agreed upon across
USENET as appropriate for following in the creating of new newsgroups in
the "standard" USENET newsgroup hierarchy. They are NOT intended as
guidelines for setting USENET policy other than group creations, and they
are not intended to apply to "alternate" or local news hierarchies. The
part of the namespace affected is comp, news, sci, misc, soc, talk, rec,
which are the most widely-distributed areas of the USENET hierarchy.
   Any group creation request which follows these guidelines to a
successful result should be honored, and any request which fails to
follow these procedures or to obtain a successful result from doing so
should be dropped, except under extraordinary circumstances.  The
reason these are called guidelines and not absolute rules is that it is
not possible to predict in advance what "extraordinary circumstances"
are or how they might arise.
   It should be pointed out here that, as always, the decision whether or not
to create a newsgroup on a given machine rests with the administrator of that
machine. These guidelines are intended merely as an aid in making those
decisions.


The Discussion

1) A request for discussion on creation of a new newsgroup should be posted to
   news.announce.newgroups, and also to any other groups or mailing lists at
   all related to the proposed topic if desired.  The group is moderated, and
   the Followup-to: header will be set so that the actual discussion takes
   place only in news.groups.  Users on sites which have difficulty posting to
   moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups
   to [e-mail].

   The article should be cross-posted among the newsgroups, including
   news.announce.newgroups, rather than posted as separate articles.  Note that
   standard behaviour for posting software is to not present the articles in
   any groups when cross-posted to a moderated group; the moderator will handle
   that for you.

2) The name and charter of the proposed group and whether it will be moderated
   or unmoderated (and if the former, who the moderator(s) will be) should be
   determined during the discussion period. If there is no general agreement on
   these points among the proponents of a new group at the end of 30 days of
   discussion, the discussion should be taken offline (into mail instead of
   news.groups) and the proponents should iron out the details among
   themselves.  Once that is done, a new, more specific proposal may be made,
   going back to step 1) above.

3) Group advocates seeking help in choosing a name to suit the proposed
   charter, or looking for any other guidance in the creation procedure, can
   send a message to [e-mail]; a few seasoned news administrators
   are available through this address.

The Vote

1) AFTER the discussion period, if it has been determined that a new group is
   really desired, a name and charter are agreed upon, and it has been
   determined whether the group will be moderated and if so who will
   moderate it, a call for votes may be posted to news.announce.newgroups and
   any other groups or mailing lists that the original request for discussion
   might have been posted to. There should be minimal delay between the
   end of the discussion period and the issuing of a call for votes.
   The call for votes should include clear instructions for how to cast
   a vote. It must be as clearly explained and as easy to do to cast a
   vote for creation as against it, and vice versa.  It is explicitly
   permitted to set up two separate addresses to mail yes and no votes
   to provided that they are on the same machine, to set up an address
   different than that the article was posted from to mail votes to, or
   to just accept replies to the call for votes article, as long as it
   is clearly and explicitly stated in the call for votes article how
   to cast a vote.  If two addresses are used for a vote, the reply
   address must process and accept both yes and no votes OR reject
   them both.

2) The voting period should last for at least 21 days and no more than 31
   days, no matter what the preliminary results of the vote are. The exact
   date that the voting period will end should be stated in the call for
   votes. Only votes that arrive on the vote-taker's machine prior to this
   date will be counted.

3) A couple of repeats of the call for votes may be posted during the vote,
   provided that they contain similar clear, unbiased instructions for
   casting a vote as the original, and provided that it is really a repeat
   of the call for votes on the SAME proposal (see #5 below). Partial vote
   results should NOT be included; only a statement of the specific new
   group proposal, that a vote is in progress on it, and how to cast a vote.
   It is permitted to post a "mass acknowledgement" in which all the names
   of those from whom votes have been received are posted, as long as no
   indication is made of which way anybody voted until the voting period
   is officially over.

4) ONLY votes MAILED to the vote-taker will count. Votes posted to the net
   for any reason (including inability to get mail to the vote-taker) and
   proxy votes (such as having a mailing list maintainer claim a vote for
   each member of the list) will not be counted.

5) Votes may not be transferred to other, similar proposals. A vote shall
   count only for the EXACT proposal that it is a response to. In particular,
   a vote for or against a newsgroup under one name shall NOT be counted as
   a vote for or against a newsgroup with a different name or charter,
   a different moderated/unmoderated status or (if moderated) a different
   moderator or set of moderators.

6) Votes MUST be explicit; they should be of the form "I vote for the
   group foo.bar as proposed" or "I vote against the group foo.bar
   as proposed". The wording doesn't have to be exact, it just needs to
   be unambiguous. In particular, statements of the form "I would vote
   for this group if..." should be considered comments only and not
   counted as votes.

7) A vote should be run only for a single group proposal.  Attempts to create
   multiple groups should be handled by running multiple parallel votes rather
   than one vote to create all of the groups.

The Result

1) At the completion of the voting period, the vote taker must post the
   vote tally and the E-mail addresses and (if available) names of the voters
   received to news.announce.newgroups and any other groups or mailing lists
   to which the original call for votes was posted. The tally should include
   a statement of which way each voter voted so that the results can be
   verified.

2) AFTER the vote result is posted, there will be a 5 day waiting period,
   beginning when the voting results actually appear in
   news.announce.newgroups, during which the net will have a chance to
   correct any errors in the voter list or the voting procedure.

3) AFTER the waiting period, and if there were no serious objections that might
   invalidate the vote, and if 100 more valid YES/create votes are received
   than NO/don't create AND at least 2/3 of the total number of valid votes
   received are in favor of creation, a newgroup control message may be sent
   out.  If the 100 vote margin or 2/3 percentage is not met, the group should
   not be created.

4) The newgroup message will be sent by the news.announce.newgroups moderator
   at the end of the waiting period of a successful vote.  If the new group is
   moderated, the vote-taker should send a message during the waiting period to
   Gene Spafford <[e-mail]> and David C. Lawrence <[e-mail]> with
   both the moderator's contact address and the group's submission address.

5) A proposal which has failed under point (3) above should not again be
   brought up for discussion until at least six months have passed from the
   close of the vote.  This limitation does not apply to proposals which never
   went to vote.

Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu misc.consumers:59698 news.answers:3669
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,news.answers
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.bbn.com!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!ukma!netsys!pagesat!spssig.spss.com!adams
From: [e-mail] (Steve Adams)
Subject: misc.consumers FAQ on credit diff 1 of 4
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: misc.consumers
Sender: [e-mail] (Net News Admin)
Organization: SPSS Inc.
References: none
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1992 17:40:25 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:40:25 GMT
Lines: 36

Archive-name: consumer-credit-faq/diff1
Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992


As the consumer-credit FAQ is quite long, I'm posting diffs for those of
you who already have copies of last month's edition.  If you want the
whole thing, don't worry:  I'm posting it next, with subject heads "misc
consumers FAQ on credit part 1 of 4" etc.

I've omitted trivial diffs, those involving only formatting and
punctuation and renumbering questions.


12c12
< Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992
---
> Last-modified: 21 Oct 1992
143c143
< section 6.  Miscellaneous credit-card stuff
---
> section 6.  Miscellaneous credit-card stuff/Fair Debt Collection Act
149c149
<     606. How far can collection agencies go in bothering me?
---
>     606. What may creditors do?  Fair Debt Collection Act.
261,262c261,262
< Dave Niebuhr, Rich Salz, Mark Schuldenfrei, Russell Schulz, Carol
< Springs, William December Starr, Ivan Weisz, David Whiteman, Tom
---
> Dave Niebuhr, Rich Salz, Robert Sawyer, Mark Schuldenfrei, Russell Schulz,
> Carol Springs, William December Starr, Ivan Weisz, David Whiteman, Tom
--
  The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                         -------------------
   [e-mail]                                  Phone: [phone]
   Steve Adams        "Space-age cybernomad"       Fax:   [phone]
Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu misc.consumers:59699 news.answers:3670
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,news.answers
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.bbn.com!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!adams
From: [e-mail] (Steve Adams)
Subject: misc.consumers FAQ on credit diff 2 of 4
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: misc.consumers
Sender: [e-mail] (Net News Admin)
Organization: SPSS Inc.
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1992 17:42:50 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:42:51 GMT
Lines: 33

Archive-name: consumer-credit-faq/diff2
Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992


Please see part 1 for explanations.

12c12
< Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992
---
> Last-modified: 21 Oct 1992
177a178,182
>     A reader has reported that his Schwab account has a debit-type card
>     associated with it, but it is treated like a credit card for other
>     purposes.  In other words, it is a credit card, but the debit is made
>     immediately to his Schwab account.
>
623,626c628,633
<     located; dial 1, the area code, and 555-1212.  Then call the bank
<     and ask for an application.  Alternatively, larger public libraries
<     have banking directories and can probably give you the information
<     at the reference desk or by phone.
---
>     located (or you can call 411, or the Operator); dial 1, the area code,
>     and 555-1212.  Then call the bank and ask for an application.
>     Alternatively, larger public libraries have banking directories and
>     can probably give you the information at the reference desk or by
>
>     phone.
--
  The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                         -------------------
   [e-mail]                                  Phone: [phone]
   Steve Adams        "Space-age cybernomad"       Fax:   [phone]
Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu misc.consumers:59700 news.answers:3671
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,news.answers
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.bbn.com!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!netsys!pagesat!spssig.spss.com!adams
From: [e-mail] (Steve Adams)
Subject: misc.consumers FAQ on credit diff 3 of 4
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: misc.consumers
Sender: [e-mail] (Net News Admin)
Organization: SPSS Inc.
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1992 17:44:31 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:44:31 GMT
Lines: 127

Archive-name: consumer-credit-faq/diff3
Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992


Please see part 1 for explanations.

12c12
< Last-modified: 21 Aug 1992
---
> Last-modified: 21 Oct 1992
220c220
<     handle these for free, if your state lets you pay license feed by
---
>     handle these for free, if your state lets you pay license fees by
465a466,469
>     In addition, you MAY successfully protest charges outside of these
>     parameters, but there is no legal requirement for the credit card
>     company to do so.
>
729c733
< Q606. How far can collection agencies go in bothering me?
---
> Q606. What may creditors do?  Fair Debt Collection Act.
737d740
<     - violence or the threat of violence against persons or property;
739c742,743
<     - obscene, profane, or abusive language;
---
>       o  The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to
>          harm the physical person, reputation or property of any person.
741,743c745,746
<     - repeated telephone calls with intent to "annoy, abuse, or harass",
<       or calls or visits at inconvenient or unusual times (generally,
<       before 8 am or after 9 pm);
---
>       o  The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural
>          consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.
745,746c748,750
<     - visits at your workplace "if it is known the employer prohibits
<       such contact";
---
>       o  Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone
>          conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy,
>          abuse, or harass any person at the called number.
748,749c752,755
<     - falsely letting the debtor think that the collector is a
<       government agent, or an attorney;
---
>       o  The false representation or implication that the debt collector
>          is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States
>          or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or
>          facsimile thereof.
751,752c757,758
<     - pretending that a document is from any source other than the true
<       one;
---
>       o  The false representation or implication that any individual is
>          an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney.
754,756c760,768
<     - a threat (overt or implied) that the debtor can go to jail or have
<       property seized or wages attached, when that action would be
<       illegal or the collector doesn't actually plan such action;
---
>       o  The representation or implication that nonpayment of any debt
>          will result in the arrest or imprisonment of any person or the
>          seizure, garnishment, attachment or sale of any property or
>          wages of any person, when such action is unlawful or the debt
>          collector does not intend to take such action.
>
>       o  The false representation or implication that the consumer
>          committed any crime or other personal conduct, in order to
>          disgrace the consumer.
758,759c770,773
<     - giving anyone any false credit information, including failing to
<       mention that the debtor disputes a debt if that is true;
---
>       o  Communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit
>          information which is known or which should be known to be false,
>          including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is
>          disputed.
761c775,782
<     - publicizing the debt;
---
>       o  The use or distribution of any written communication which
>          simulates or is falsely represented to be a document authorized,
>          issued, or approved by any court, official, or agency of the
>          United States or any State, or which creates a false impression
>          as to its source, authorization, or approval.
>
>       o  The false representation or implication that accounts have been
>          turned over to innocent purchasers for value.
763,764c784,810
<     - a lie (overt or implied) about whether particular documents are or
<       are not legal process.
---
>       o  The false representation or implication that documents are legal
>          process.
>
>       o  The false representation or implication that documents are *not*
>          legal process forms or do not require action by the consumer.
>
>       o  Communication with debtor at unusual or known-inconvient time or
>          place.
>
>       o  Communication with third parties without debtor consent.
>
>       o  False or Misleading Representations including
>
>           + The threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken
>             or that is not intended to be taken.
>
>           + Communication or threatening to communicate to any person credit
>             information which is known or which should be known to be false,
>             including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is
>             disputed.
>
>           + The use or distribution of any written communication which
>             simulates or is falsesly represented to be a document
>             authorized, issued, or approved by any court, official, or
>             agency of the United States or any State, or which creates
>             a false impression as to its source, authorization, or
>             approval.
--
  The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                         -------------------
   [e-mail]                                  Phone: [phone]
   Steve Adams        "Space-age cybernomad"       Fax:   [phone]
Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu misc.consumers:59701 news.answers:3672
Newsgroups: misc.consumers,news.answers
Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.bbn.com!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!netsys!pagesat!spssig.spss.com!adams
From: [e-mail] (Steve Adams)
Subject: misc.consumers FAQ on credit diff 4 of 4
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: misc.consumers
Sender: [e-mail] (Net News Admin)
Organization: SPSS Inc.
References: <[e-mail]>
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1992 17:44:57 GMT
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:44:58 GMT
Lines: 19